Skip to main content

The Role of Experience in Six Sigma Project Success: An Empirical Analysis of Improvement Projects

Item

Title

The Role of Experience in Six Sigma Project Success: An Empirical Analysis of Improvement Projects

Abstract/Description

Recent learning-by-doing research highlights the importance of examining multiple measures of experience and their relationship to the performance of work teams. Our paper studies the role of individual experience, organizational experience, team leader experience, and experience working together on a team (team familiarity) in the context of improvement teams. To do so, we analyze successful and failed six sigma improvement team projects at a Fortune 500 consumer products manufacturer with multiple business groups. Such improvement project teams focus on deliberate learning, which differs from the primary focus of work teams. Our analysis uses archival data generated by these improvement project teams over a six year time span. Of the four experience variables we study, we find that team leader experience exhibits the strongest relationship with project success, followed by organizational experience. Further, in contrast to prior-related research on work teams, we find no relationship between individual experience or team familiarity and project success beyond that explained by team leader and organizational experience. These results suggest that a well-developed and deployed structured problem-solving process—characteristic of effective six sigma deployments—may reduce the importance of team familiarity in the context of improvement teams.

Date

Volume

30

Issue

7-8

Pages

481-493

Resource type

Research/Scholarly Media

Resource status/form

Published Text

Scholarship genre

Empirical

Open access/full-text available

No

Peer reviewed

Yes

ISSN

1873-1317

Citation

Easton, G. S., & Rosenzweig, E. D. (2012). The Role of Experience in Six Sigma Project Success: An Empirical Analysis of Improvement Projects. Journal of Operations Management, 30(7–8), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.08.002

Comments

No comment yet! Be the first to add one!

Contribute

Login or click your token link to edit this record.

Export