Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor
Item
Title
Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor
Abstract/Description
One of the most distinctive features of pragmatism's conception of democracy is the strong connection that it makes between science and democracy. Not only must science be democratically organized, Dewey argues, but democracy must also be a form of social inquiry that incorporates the cognitive division of labon The pervasiveness of agent/principal relationships that results from the "social organization of intelligence" presents a problem for deliberative democracy. In order that deliberation can become more than "mere discussion," the division of labor implies that it will sometimes be impossible for citizens to test the 'knowledge employed by experts. Using AIDS activism as an example, I propose that citizens will nonetheless be able to engage in public deliberation about the norms of cooperation between expert agents and lay principals, including even epistemic norms of validity, reliability, and evidence.
Author/creator
Date
In publication
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
590-607
Resource type
Background/Context
Medium
Print
Background/context type
Conceptual
Open access/free-text available
No
Peer reviewed
Yes
ISSN
0092-5853
DOI
Citation
Bohman, J. (1999). Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor. American Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991808
Comments
No comment yet! Be the first to add one!