Open Access Resource (IRE)
Item set
Title
                                Open Access Resource (IRE)
                                                            
                            Items
- 
        Creating a System for Data-Driven Decision-Making: Applying the Principal-Agent FrameworkWohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a System for Data-Driven Decision-Making: Applying the Principal-Agent Framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802246376  
- 
        Common Core, Uncommon Theory of Action: CEOs in New York City SchoolsWohlstetter, P., Buck, B., Houston, D. M., & Smith, C. O. (2016). Common Core, Uncommon Theory of Action: CEOs in New York City Schools. In A. J. Daly & K. S. Finnigan (Eds.), Thinking and Acting Systemically: Improving School Districts Under Pressure (pp. 147–182). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-46-2_6  
- 
        The Institutional Logics PerspectiveThornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). The Institutional Logics Perspective. In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 1–22). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0187  
- 
        Strong Districts and Their Leadership Project: Executive Summary of ResearchLeithwood, K., & Mccullough, C. (2017). Strong Districts and Their Leadership Project: Executive Summary of Research. Council of Ontario Directors of Education.  
- 
        Place-Based Governance and Leadership in Decentralised School Systems: Evidence from EnglandGreany, T. (2022). Place-Based Governance and Leadership in Decentralised School Systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554  
- 
        Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School DistrictGlazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051  
- 
        District-led School Turnaround: Aiming for Ambitious and Equitable Instruction in Shelby County’s iZoneGlazer, J., Massell, D., Lenhoff, S. W., Larbi-Cherif, A., Egan, C., Taylor, J., Ison, A., Deleveaux, J., & Millington, Z. (2020). District-led School Turnaround: Aiming for Ambitious and Equitable Instruction in Shelby County’s iZone (CPRE Research Reports). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_researchreports/114  
- 
        The Ties That Bind: Building Civic Capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School DistrictGlazer, J. L., & Egan, C. (2018). The Ties That Bind: Building Civic Capacity for the Tennessee Achievement School District. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088  
- 
        Managing Networks for School Improvement: Seven Lessons from the FieldDuff, M., Flack, C., Lyle, A., Massell, D., & Wohlstetter, P. (2019). Managing Networks for School Improvement: Seven Lessons from the Field (CPRE Workbooks). https://repository.upenn.edu/cpre_workbooks/1  
- 
        Multi-Academy Trusts: Do They Make a Difference to Pupil Outcomes?Bernardinelli, D., Rutt, S., Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Multi-Academy Trusts: Do They Make a Difference to Pupil Outcomes? In UCL IOE Press: London, UK. [Report]. UCL IOE Press.  
- 
        If They Knew Then What We Know Now, Why Haven't Things Changed? An Examination of District Effectiveness ResearchAnderson, E., & Young, M. D. (2018). If They Knew Then What We Know Now, Why Haven’t Things Changed? An Examination of District Effectiveness Research. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00087  
- 
        Unpacking Tracking: The Role of Instruction, Teacher Beliefs and Supplemental Courses in the Relationship Between Tracking and Student AchievementSchmidt, R. A. (2013). Unpacking Tracking: The Role of Instruction, Teacher Beliefs and Supplemental Courses in the Relationship Between Tracking and Student Achievement [Ph.D., Vanderbilt University]. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/handle/1803/10767  
- 
        Mathematics Coaching for Conceptual Understanding: Promising Evidence Regarding the Tennessee Math Coaching ModelRussell, J. L., Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Thomas, A., Bill, V., & Speranzo, L. (2020). Mathematics Coaching for Conceptual Understanding: Promising Evidence Regarding the Tennessee Math Coaching Model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720940699  
- 
        Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics CurriculaRemillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211  
- 
        Students’ Responses to Curricular Activities as Indicator of Coherence in Project-Based SciencePenuel, W., Van Horne, K., Severance, S., Quigley, D., & Sumner, T. (2016, July). Students’ Responses to Curricular Activities as Indicator of Coherence in Project-Based Science. ICLS 2016 Proceedings. ICLS 2016, Singapore. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/327  
- 
        How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and CulturesNational Research Council. (2018). How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783  
- 
        A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core IdeasNational Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165  
- 
        How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded EditionNational Research Council. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853  
- 
        Argument Writing Advanced Institute: Teaching Teachers to Utilize C3WP UnitsMoman, J., & Maher, S. (2019). Argument Writing Advanced Institute: Teaching Teachers to Utilize C3WP Units. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2208  
- 
        Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective ActivityMcDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807  
